Notes from 11/25/08 Covering pgs. 473-481
-Slavery Issue forced Congress hand in 1849-1850
--California and New Mexico were major issues, Southerners demanded stronger fugitive slave law after the Supreme Court ruled in Prigg vs. Pennsylvania of 1842, that states weren't obligated to enforce the return of runaway slaves.
--Anti-slavery Northerners wanted an end to the slave trade in the District of Colombia.
--Texas and New Mexico feuding over boundary.
-Henry Clay thought he could mastermind another compromise and in January of 1850 he presented 8 proposals to the Senate.
-The first 6 paired offering concessions to the North and South.
1) Admit California as a free state. No restrictions on slavery in the rest of cession.
2) Settle boundary dispute in favor of New Mexico, compensate Texas financially.
3) Abolish slave trade in District of Colombia. Guarentee continuation of slavery in D. C. unless Maryland and Virginia agree to abolish it.
Last 2 Proposals:
4) Congress have no jurisdiction over interstate slave trade.
5) A new, strong, national fugitive slave law.
-Clay lumped proposals into 1 bill and many Congressman disliked parts so it was defeated.
Leadership passed to Stephen Douglas from Illinois.
--Broke bill apart and gained a majority.
--Both Calhoun and President Taylor die.
-Compromise of 1850
--Call admitted as free state.
--Rest of the cession - New Mexico and Utah - organized without restrictions on slavery.
--Settle Texas and New Mexico border issue in favor of New Mexico and Texas compensated with $10 million.
--Abolish slave trade in District of Colombia and guaranteed slavery there.
--New fugitive law.
-Compromise of 1850 - a package of individual laws supported by different Congressional majorities.
-Results somewhat unexpected:
--California began to vote with the South on most issues.
--Utah and New Mexico legalized slavery but Daniel Webster argued and few slaves were actually brought there.
--Fugitive slave law created major heart burn and discontent.
-South had reason to complain.
--When slave-catchers kidnapped free slaves, Northern states responded with anti-kidnapping laws that gave fugitive slaves trial by jury.
-Prigg vs. Pennsylvania ruled that enforcing the Constitution's fugitive slave law was a federal responsibility, not a state duty. Northern states passed personal liberty laws prohibiting use of state courts, jails, police, or sheriffs to recapture slaves.
-(pg. 476) Strict to the point that Abolitionists vowed to resist it.
--Slave catchers who went North were met by violence.
--Violence turned many Northerners who had not abolitionists against slavery.
--North's failure to enforce new fugutive slave act was a souther grievance in the 1850s and a cause of southern secession in 1861.
-Uncle Tom's Cabin -> pg. 478-479
--Know success, story line, Souther reaction.
-Filibustering -> pg. 478-479
*Notice U. S. interest in Cuba, particularly the Ostend Manifesto.
--Essentially a letter made public in which American ambassadors to Britain, France, and Spain declared if Spain wouldn't sell Cuba, U. S. should just go take it.
--Public reaction was loud uproar which caused Pierce administration to repudiate document.
--Interest in Cuba as future slavery territory was real.
-pg. 480-481 -> William Walker in Nicaragua.
=)